Contract Abrogation

When contract abrogation has been established as an accepted pathway, signatures are meaningless... and handshakes are not worth the germs they pass.

Once a contract is required to overcome counter party resistance and the enforceability of any contract may be questioned, contract law has been inverted or nullified, depending upon what either party may argue for or against.

It is no coincidence that contract law is a product of the English speaking world. This fact should not be overlooked.

In times such as these, when doing business with, or when entertaining any personal relationship, examine:

1.) Why do I need this deal? Do I need this deal?

2.) How might doing this deal damage or inflict harm upon me?

3.) If I do not do this deal, how much better off might I be? Will I gain or continue to possess resources that I may better deploy in more secure dealings with more appropriate counter parties?

4.) If a contract is involved, the situation, by definition, requires a legal, enforceable, identification of all responsibilities and obligations upon all parties. The question is, "Why?"

If a contract is required only due to complexities, including stipulation of technical aspects, financing, and time-related details, the deal may be worthy of consideration.

If a contract is needed as an attempt to reign in counter parties and ensure that they meet their obligations, the deal should be considered for discard.

It appears that soon contract abrogation will have been anointed with legal precedent. Significantly, all counter parties will be aware of their ability to abrogate any contract -- or at least modify for enhancement their obligations and commitments.

There can be no profitable deal made with untrustworthy counter parties. Once any one or more, or all rules, stipulations, promises, and commitments may be modified for any contract, there is potential for all contracts to become meaningless. Time is the limiting factor. Jurisdiction is the unknown factor.

The US Constitution is a contract between all Americans and the government that they choose to allow to handle only specific functions to specifically limited degrees.

In 2009, the United States of America is plagued by a Congress wherein both the Senate and House are chaotically, frantically, without proper deliberation, and without regard for the US Constitution, contriving and enacting legislation which is contra and antithetical to the US Constitution.

Members of the US Congress appear consumed by power they perceive has been bestowed upon them by the empowering of a socialist, Lenin-style Communist as president. This president has an obsessive psychological need to control people and every aspect of their environment. Implementation of his beliefs and objectives operate to abrogate his oath. His actions move him beyond the office he accepted when he swore allegiance to the US Constitution.